| |
| Tata |
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2026 6:06 pm Post subject: NSOP cause from Carbond layer |
| |
The EDX was performed on good and NSOP pad (5 keV). Both present a
peak of C and shown highly in die surface. So I'm not sure is C shall be considered as 1 factor of NSOP. //Tata |
|
| Back to top |
|
| FARel Engr |
|
Joined: 20 Jun 2026 Posts: 76
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2026 9:43 pm Post subject: |
| |
Hi Tata,
'NSOP' means 'non-sticking on pad', right? First Q - why did you get a C peak in the EDX spectrum of your good pad? What's the composition of your bond pad? The EDX spectrum of most good bond pads only show Al or Al and Si. If your bond pads are not supposed to have C, then maybe it possibly came from a contam on the pad.
Pls do the EDX again at a slightly higher EHT. 5 keV is too low to make the pad emit many important peaks for common contaminants. I suggest that you also do the EDX at 7-10 keV. Experiment just to make sure you are not missing some peaks.
The 'good' bond pad that you're comparing to must not come from the same lot of your affected unit. It must be from a known clean lot, so you'll really know what the EDX spectrum of a good bond pad really is. Keep us posted.
Thanks,
FARel Engr |
|
| Back to top |
|
| Tata |
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2026 9:25 am Post subject: |
| |
Thanks for your input. Forgot to tell you that actually I did at 10 kev, and peak of Al and Si has present. Anyway will find a good know die for doing
EDX then will compared with NSOP pad again // Tata |
|
| Back to top |
|
| Choose Display Order |
|
| User Permissions |
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Skin Created by: Sigma12 Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|
|