| |
| Tata |
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2026 4:31 pm Post subject: Crack on die glassivation layer after T/C |
| |
Hi friends,
Anybody experience in Die crack after 500T/C test. Crack almost appear at die cornner. What shall we look for root cause ? Only material mismatch or else....?
Onething that I'd observed during FA is zero die adhesive bond line thinckness. Is it possible to be root cause ?
Package type is PDIP.
THANK YOU IN ADVANCE HELP
Tata |
|
| Back to top |
|
| FARel Engr |
|
Joined: 20 Jun 2026 Posts: 76
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2026 5:51 pm Post subject: |
| |
Hi Tata,
Yes, I think you are correct to suspect your zero D/A BLT as a possible cause of the die cracks. Proper coverage and distribution of D/A material plays an important role in minimizing the stress experienced by the die. Even if you have enough D/A material, die cracking is a threat if there are voids or incomplete coverage in some areas under the die. Note that D/A voids are 'stress concentrators', i.e., they amplify the stress experienced by the die where they are located.
FARel Engr |
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
|
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2026 6:09 pm Post subject: |
| |
Thanks,, Hmmmmmmm I think we shall have a party immediaetly if we
have a chance.... //Tata |
|
| Back to top |
|
| bago |
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 24, 2026 2:30 pm Post subject: |
| |
the root cause is the t/c test. t/c test is a destructive test, on which the device will eventually fail the longer it was subjected to it. Crazing or the di crack that you observed is a typical failure mechanism of device failing t/c test, specially those subjected to conditions c or d and beyond 100 cycles.
the failure analysis approach should be to know the purpose of the t/c test and to relate the defect seen into it. E.g. if you are qualifying the wire bonding and you saw crazing as failure mechanism - then it can be concluded that the qualification pass since the failure mechanism is not related to it.
However, if this is a pacakge reliability monitor and you saw crazing as a frequent failure mechanism - then you might consider improving some of the pacakge design such that you can attain 500 t/c cycles with zero or minimum failure. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| Choose Display Order |
|
| User Permissions |
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Skin Created by: Sigma12 Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|
|